Skip to main content

ESIG - Accelerating the Integration of Variable Generation into Utility Power Systems

  • Members Area
  • About
    • Energy Systems Integration
    • Leadership Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Advisory Council
    • Newsroom
    • ESIG Excellence Awards
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • ESIG Reports/Briefs
    • Past Webinars
    • Past Workshop Presentations
    • Resource Library
    • Quick Reference Guides
    • IEEE Power & Energy Contributions
  • Membership
    • Current ESIG Members
    • Become a Member
    • Member Benefits
    • Student Memberships
    • Mentoring Program
    • Membership Referral
  • Working / Users Groups
    • Task Forces
    • Large Loads Task Force
    • Distributed Energy Resources (DER) Working Group
    • Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Users Group
    • Reliability Working Group
    • Research & Education Working Group
    • System Operation & Market Design Working Group
    • System Planning Working Group
    • GETs User Group
    • Probabilistic VRE Forecasting and Markets User Group
  • Contact
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Sponsorship Opportunities
  • Join
  • Login

This report, New Resource Adequacy Criteria for the Energy Transition: Modernizing Reliability Requirements, outlines the need for, and a path toward, the use of a multi-metric criteria approach in resource adequacy analysis.

As we move toward a cleaner and more weather-dependent power system, ensuring resource adequacy becomes more nuanced. It requires a new way of setting resource adequacy thresholds that is responsive to the rapid load growth, plant retirements, and a shift toward variable and energy-limited resources. Resource adequacy criteria set the level of supply- and demand-side resources required for a power system to meet its reliability objectives. This standard influences billions of dollars of investment decisions.

The most common resource adequacy criterion today—the one-day-in-10-year loss-of-load expectation (or LOLE) in North America. However, this single metric only measures the frequency of outages and doesn’t capture the size, duration, or timing of generation shortfalls. It also treats longer or widespread outages as equal to shorter, less severe outages. This failure to accurately reflect the real-world nature and impact of power outages, which vary enormously in their economic and human consequences, limits planners’ ability to accurately and efficiently plan a reliable system.

The report explores what it might look like to adopt a multi-metric criteria approach, a framework that would provide a more comprehensive assessment of the size, frequency, and duration of shortfalls; explicitly consider rare, high-impact events such as extreme weather; and stress-test extreme events that may fall outside historical records.

The report also discusses the need for a system’s resource adequacy criteria to establish the appropriate trade-off between reliability and cost. Different options for improving reliability come at different costs, and eliminating all risk in the system is not possible; therefore, as a society, we have to decide how much we will pay for reliability. It is crucial for resource adequacy criteria to capture this intrinsic link between cost and reliability, and for it to be transparent and well understood by all involved.

Quicklinks

  • Member’s Area
  • Join ESIG

Contact

704-473-0135

PO Box 2787
Reston, Virginia
20195 USA

info@esig.energy

Follow Us!

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on YouTube
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

Special Thanks To Our Sustaining Members

© 2025 ESIG. All Rights Reserved
Custom Site by VIEO Design