Skip to main content

ESIG - Accelerating the Integration of Variable Generation into Utility Power Systems

  • Members Area
  • About
    • Energy Systems Integration
    • Leadership Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Advisory Council
    • Newsroom
    • ESIG Excellence Awards
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • ESIG Reports/Briefs
    • Past Webinars
    • Past Workshop Presentations
    • Resource Library
    • Quick Reference Guides
    • IEEE Power & Energy Contributions
  • Membership
    • Current ESIG Members
    • Become a Member
    • Member Benefits
    • Student Memberships
    • Mentoring Program
    • Membership Referral
  • Working / Users Groups
    • Task Forces
    • Large Loads Task Force
    • Distributed Energy Resources (DER) Working Group
    • Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Users Group
    • Reliability Working Group
    • Research & Education Working Group
    • System Operation & Market Design Working Group
    • System Planning Working Group
    • GETs User Group
    • Probabilistic VRE Forecasting and Markets User Group
  • Contact
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Sponsorship Opportunities
  • Join
  • Login

Clipper: Liberty

Clipper’s Liberty series is represented by three-blade, upwind, horizontal axis wind turbines with a rated capacity of 2.5-megawatts. Four different models represent the Liberty – 2.5 MW series – C89, C93, C96, and C99.

Liberty is a variable speed wind turbine with a four permanent magnet generators distributed powertrain. The rotor on a Liberty turbine is designed to operate in an upwind configuration at 9.6 to 15.5 revolutions per minute (rpm). The Liberty – 2.5 MW series provides the option of a selectable power factor between 0.95 (overexcited/lagging) and 0.95 (underexcited/leading). For example, by configuring the machine to operate at a slightly overexcited (lagging) power factor, the inverters can compensate for reactive power losses within the wind plant collection system, providing approximately unity power factor operation at the point of interconnection over a wide range of plant output.

Clipper: Liberty
Power Regulation Pitch regulated with variable speed
Operating Data
Rated Power 2500 KW [1]
Cut-in wind speed 4 m/s (9 mph)
Cut-out wind speed 25 m/s (55mph)
Wind Class IEC IA (C89); IEC IIA (C93); IEC IIB (C96); IEC IIIB (C100)
Rotor
Rotor diameter 89 m (292 ft) for the C89, 93 m (305 ft) for the C93, 96 m (315 ft) for the C96 model, and 99 m (325 ft) for the C99 model.
Operational interval 9.6 – 15.5 rpm
Towers
Type Partial Conical – Tubular Steel, 4 Steel Plate Sections
Hub heights 80 m (262 ft)/Other Options Available.
Generator
Type 4 x Synchronous Permanent Magnet (660 kW at 1133 rpm each).
Nominal output 2,500 kW
Operational data 690 VAC +/- 10% Continuous; 690 VAC + 20% for 5 Seconds; 690 VAC + 30% for 0.5 Seconds; 690 VAC – 90% for 3 Seconds; 690 VAC – 100% for 150 Milliseconds.

Contents

  • 1 Vendor Specific Model Characterization
    • 1.1 Model Performance: Case 1 – Fault Event
    • 1.2 Model Performance: Case 2 – Under-Frequency Event
    • 1.3 Model Performance: Case 3 – Over-Frequency Event
  • 2 Parameterization – PSLF Environment
    • 2.1 Parameterization: Case 1 – Fault Event
    • 2.2 Parameterization: Case 2 – Under-Frequency Event
    • 2.3 Parameterization: Case 3 – Over-Frequency Event
  • 3 Results Validation
  • 4 Vendor Specific Model Validation
  • 5 References

Vendor Specific Model Characterization

Model Performance: Case 1 – Fault Event

In this case a remote fault is applied to bus 12 for a duration of 6 cycles (0.1 sec).

Liberty-2.5 MW – Case 1 and SCR=5

Liberty-2.5 MW – Case 1 and SCR=10

For both SCR settings the reactive current output of the WTG increases during the fault. A current limit of 1.11 pu on the 2.5 MVA machine base is implemented to prevent thermal damage to the converter in the event it was subjected to a short circuit near the terminals of the inverter. After the fault is removed the reactive current returns to its steady state condition.

Model Performance: Case 2 – Under-Frequency Event

In this case a under frequency event is created by tripping the 100 MVA generation unit at bus 20.

Liberty-2.5 MW – Case 2 and SCR=5

 

Liberty-2.5 MW – Case 2 and SCR=10

 

Model Performance: Case 3 – Over-Frequency Event

In this case a under frequency event is created by tripping the 100 MVA load at bus 11

Liberty-2.5 MW – Case 3 and SCR=5

 

Liberty-2.5 MW – Case 3 and SCR=10

 

Parameterization – PSLF Environment

The parameter values shown in the table resulted from a compromise between the simulated cases (i.e. SCR 5 and SCR 10) and network conditions (i.e. fault, under- and over frequency)

PSLF parameter values
wt4g wt4t wt4e
Lvplsw 1.0 Tpw 0.05 Varflg 1
Rrpwr 10.0 Kpp 0.08 Kqi 0.5
Brkpt 0.9 Kip 0.10 Kvi 40
Zerox 0.4 Tf 0.08 Vmax 1.1
Lvpll 1.22 Kf 0.00 Vmin 0.9
Volim 1.2 dPmx 0.1 Qmax 0.4
Lvpnt1 0.8 dPmn -0.1 Qmin -0.4
Lvpnt0 0.4 Tr 0.02
Tc 0.15
Kpv 18.0
Kiv 5.0
Pfaflg 0
fn 1.0
Tv 0.05
Tpwr 0.05
Iphl 1.24
Iqhl 1.25
Pqflag 0
There are three generic wind turbine models in PSLF for a type 4 wind turbine (WT4). These models are wt4g, wt4t, and wt4e. The wt4g model includes the generator and converters dynamics. The wt4t model includes the wind aerodynamic model and the wind turbine model. Finally, the wt4e model contains the real and reactive control models. The values for the parameters resulted from a compromise between the two cases (SCR 5 and SCR 10). The set of parameters had to be tuned to satisfactory match the results of dynamic simulation for the VSM and the generic WT4 model for both SCR cases.

Parameterization: Case 1 – Fault Event

Parameterization of WT4 vs Liberty-2.5 MW – Case 1 and SCR=5

 

Parameterization of WT4 vs Liberty-2.5 MW – Case 1 and SCR=10

 

Parameterization: Case 2 – Under-Frequency Event

Parameterization of WT4 vs Liberty-2.5 MW – Case 2 and SCR=5

 

Parameterization of WT4 vs Liberty-2.5 MW – Case 2 and SCR=10

 

Parameterization: Case 3 – Over-Frequency Event

Parameterization of WT4 vs Liberty-2.5 MW – Case 3 and SCR=5

 

Parameterization of WT4 vs Liberty-2.5 MW – Case 3 and SCR=10

 

Results Validation

In all figures, the response of the generic model matches the response of the VSM in the While the parameterization, for the individual cases, can be mostly done with satisfactory results, a universal set of parameters, to cover all cases, is hard to find (if at all). For cases 1 and 2 (SCR=10) and case 3 (SCR=5) the generic model matches the response of the VSM in the frequency range of interest. Thus, for these cases the PSLF model is an appropriate representation of the Liberty – 2.5 MW WTG’s behavior for fundamental frequency analysis. However, for all remaining cases and system conditions (i.e. SCR=5 and SCR=10) the generic model does not match the behavior of the VSM.

Vendor Specific Model Validation

No data available

References

  1. ↑ [1]

Quicklinks

  • Member’s Area
  • Join ESIG

Contact

704-473-0135

PO Box 2787
Reston, Virginia
20195 USA

info@esig.energy

Follow Us!

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on YouTube
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

Special Thanks To Our Sustaining Members

© 2025 ESIG. All Rights Reserved
Custom Site by VIEO Design