Skip to main content

ESIG - Accelerating the Integration of Variable Generation into Utility Power Systems

  • Members Area
  • About
    • Energy Systems Integration
    • Leadership Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Advisory Council
    • Newsroom
    • ESIG Excellence Awards
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • ESIG Reports/Briefs
    • Past Webinars
    • Past Workshop Presentations
    • Resource Library
    • Quick Reference Guides
    • IEEE Power & Energy Contributions
  • Membership
    • Current ESIG Members
    • Become a Member
    • Member Benefits
    • Student Memberships
    • Mentoring Program
    • Membership Referral
  • Working / Users Groups
    • Task Forces
    • Large Loads Task Force
    • Distributed Energy Resources (DER) Working Group
    • Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Users Group
    • Reliability Working Group
    • Research & Education Working Group
    • System Operation & Market Design Working Group
    • System Planning Working Group
    • GETs User Group
    • Probabilistic VRE Forecasting and Markets User Group
  • Contact
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Sponsorship Opportunities
  • Join
  • Login

First Grid-Forming 300 MVAr STATCOM in Germany

June 4, 2024 by Moritz Mittelstaedt, Amprion GmbH

Share this article

 

Motivation for Grid-Forming Technologies in Germany

Moritz Mittelstaedt

To guarantee a safe and stable system operation, the transmission system is designed to withstand different disturbances. In this context the Continental European power system can balance sudden power imbalances of up to 3 GW if it stays interconnected and all grid users comply with grid code requirements. However, more severe disturbances causing cascading line disconnections can result in a system split, as occurred in Europe twice in 2021. This interrupts the power transport between the two subsystems and leads to high power imbalances. Since resulting imbalances can significantly exceed the allocated power reserves of 3 GW, additional measures from the system defense plan are activated automatically depending on the frequency, to prevent a black-out of the system.

The challenges of ensuring a stable operation will continue to increase in the future. The increasing distances for power transmission increases the demand for different system services, such as inertia, reactive power, or short-circuit power. At the same time, the main providers of required system services are being lost due to the decommissioning of large conventional power plants. Consequently, in the future, power electronic devices must also contribute to the system services by having grid-forming (GFM) capabilities.

The First STATCOM of Its Kind with GFM

The STATCOM Opladen, with a reactive power rating of ±300 Mvar, is connected to a 400 kV substation in the north of Cologne, Germany, where the power system is a well meshed grid and where fairly high short-circuit power ratios are present during normal operation. However, to be prepared for both contingencies (e.g., system splits) and possible future scenarios with low short-circuit levels, the STATCOM is designed in such a way that a stable operation can be ensured almost independently of the short-circuit power. To achieve this, grid-forming behavior is implemented, which means that the converter behaves like a voltage source behind an impedance. This functionality has been implemented purely in terms of the control system and does not require an oversizing of any primary components. The grid-forming behavior has an inherently stabilizing impact on the grid voltage that counteracts changes in the grid voltage. As the advantages of the inherent behavior of grid-forming control are particularly important for dynamic considerations, the main function of the STATCOM — the provision of variable reactive power for voltage support — remains unaffected in steady-state.

Acceptance Tests and Simulation Results

To verify the behavior of the STATCOM regarding the basic grid-forming requirements, different scenarios were investigated. These include angle and amplitude jumps in the grid voltage as well as changes in the grid short-circuit power ratios. (Other scenarios were also analyzed, such as symmetrical and asymmetrical grid faults, setpoint changes, and more, but are not shown here.)

Figure 1 shows the comparison between the grid-forming and grid-following control of the STATCOM Opladen for amplitudes and angular jumps of the grid voltage. In the case of the amplitude jump, it becomes noticeable that the voltage source behavior has a significantly faster response to the change and instantaneously stabilizes the grid voltage with an inherent current contribution. This inherent contribution is offset by the higher-level voltage / reactive power control, resulting in an equal steady-state operating point for both control options. The investigation of the angular jump shows that the grid-forming control immediately provides a stabilizing effect. However, as there is no additional energy storage considered in this project, the active power support is limited, which means that the energy control of the STATCOM limits a larger contribution to protect the internal energy balance.

Figure 1: Magnitude and Phase Response for Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Behavior [1]

Figure 2 shows another characteristic aspect. In this case, the short-circuit power of the grid is reduced in a jump from 4 GVA to 0,3 GVA. As the diagrams demonstrate, the grid-forming behavior enables stable operation even under such weak grid conditions. Significantly, grid-following systems are not able to operate in a stable manner in such grid situations.

Figure 2: Sudden Jump of Short-Circuit Level for Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Behavior [1]

Outlook for GFM in Germany

Amprion will continue to improve system stability by installing additional synchronous condensers or grid-forming STATCOMs at the transmission level. In addition to the grid-forming capabilities, future STATCOMs will also be installed with additional storage to provide inertia, to contribute to meeting the future system needs. Depending on the development in the system, Amprion plans five to nine additional grid-forming units in the coming years.

To accelerate the development of grid-forming converters, Germany also plans a market-based procurement in the form of a bonus system for grid-forming converters with a contribution to inertia. For this purpose, a common definition of grid-forming capabilities is being developed by the corresponding national standards committee VDE FNN.

[1] “Simulations and Field Experience of Opladen STATCOM with Grid-Forming Behavior”, Mitra et al., CIGRE B4 International SC Meeting and Colloquium, September 2023, Vienna, Austria


Moritz Mittelstaedt
Lead, System Dynamics
Amprion GmbH

Comments

  1. Darshana says

    June 17, 2024 at 8:25 am

    Could you share the 3ph n LL ph fault behavior of the STATCOM ?

    Reply
  2. Eike Ben Erdmann says

    June 25, 2024 at 1:37 am

    Figure 1 is showing increased acitve power infeed on a large scale. How is this possible with a STATCOM without a battery?

    Reply
  3. Hantao Cui says

    September 24, 2024 at 3:06 pm

    Any current plot? How many times is the instantaneous current of a grid-forming control compared to the grid following?

    Reply
  4. Hantao Cui says

    September 24, 2024 at 3:14 pm

    > Figure 1 is showing increased acitve power infeed on a large scale. How is this possible with a STATCOM without a battery?

    It’s “borrowed” from other generators because of the sudden phase jumping ahead. But as other generators catch up in the phase angle, the swings will absorb back the active power. Therefore, by inspection, the areas of the active power curve above and below zero are the same.

    Reply
  5. Ajith Kumar Ega says

    January 23, 2025 at 4:37 pm

    Can I request you to share the STATCOM behaviour for 3LG and LLG faults, do you also have it modelled in full system network typically PSSE or power factory?

    Reply
  6. Ajit says

    January 23, 2025 at 4:40 pm

    Can I request you to share the STATCOM behaviour for 3LG and LLG faults, do you also have it modelled in full system network typically PSSE or power factory?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Grid Forming: A Solution to (Some of) Our Grid Stability Challenges
  • Engaging with Large Loads
  • Energy Systems Integration Group (ESIG) Announces 2025 Excellence Awards
  • Facilitating International Collaboration to Maximize the Value of Renewable Energy Forecasting
  • Germany’s Paragraph 14a EnWG: A Model for the World to Unleash Flexibility and Ensure Distribution Network Security?

Quicklinks

  • Member’s Area
  • Join ESIG

Contact

704-473-0135

PO Box 2787
Reston, Virginia
20195 USA

info@esig.energy

Follow Us!

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on YouTube
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

Special Thanks To Our Sustaining Members

© 2025 ESIG. All Rights Reserved
Custom Site by VIEO Design