Skip to main content

ESIG - Accelerating the Integration of Variable Generation into Utility Power Systems

  • Members Area
  • About
    • Energy Systems Integration
    • Leadership Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Advisory Council
    • Newsroom
    • ESIG Excellence Awards
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • ESIG Reports/Briefs
    • Past Webinars
    • Past Workshop Presentations
    • Resource Library
    • Quick Reference Guides
    • IEEE Power & Energy Contributions
  • Membership
    • Current ESIG Members
    • Become a Member
    • Member Benefits
    • Student Memberships
    • Mentoring Program
    • Membership Referral
  • Working / Users Groups
    • Task Forces
    • Large Loads Task Force
    • Distributed Energy Resources (DER) Working Group
    • Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Users Group
    • Reliability Working Group
    • Research & Education Working Group
    • System Operation & Market Design Working Group
    • System Planning Working Group
    • GETs User Group
    • Probabilistic VRE Forecasting and Markets User Group
  • Contact
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Sponsorship Opportunities
  • Join
  • Login

To Help the Grid, It’s Not Just About When to Charge EVs, But Where

December 6, 2022 by Jennifer Chen - World Resources Institute

Share this article

Transmission and energy storage are centerpiece policies designed to address extreme weather and an evolving resource mix. Electric vehicles (EVs), which could represent up to 27% of global electricity demand by 2050, add an often overlooked option to cost-effectively enhance grid resilience and flexibility. If transmission transmits electricity across land, and batteries absorb and release it over time, EV batteries can do both.

Jennifer Chen

Leveraging Locational Flexibility of EV Charging for Grid Needs

Grid needs vary by both location and time, but end-use rate design has traditionally focused largely on time of use. However, mobile batteries that can charge anywhere could help relieve transmission constraints that produce high prices for customers and low prices for generators. EVs that are flexible as to where they charge could soak up electricity where it is plentiful and cheap. Exposing EV charging to wholesale locational marginal prices could help reduce renewable curtailment, ramping needs, and negative pricing (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Frequency of Negative Locational Marginal Prices in 2020

Negative electricity prices result from transmission congestion and predominantly occur when demand is low and wind production is high.

Source: Plentiful electricity turns wholesale prices negative, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Major trucking routes crisscross the United States, with increased traffic in areas where transmission is more challenging to site (see Figure 2). EVs traveling along these corridors can charge where the prices are lowest to help relieve bottled up wind and solar, thus reducing renewable curtailments.

Figure 2: Estimated Average Daily Volumes for Trucks on National Highway System 2017

Major flows include freight moving by truck on highway segments with more than 25 Freight Analysis Framework trucks per day and between places typically more than fifty miles apart.

Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Freight Management and Operations, Freight Analysis Framework, version 5.1. Flows include 42 different commodities.

Customer Behavior, Which Is Critical to Reducing Energy Transition and Electrification Costs, Is Being Shaped Now

Engaging electricity customer demand is recognized as a cost-effective means of reacting to grid conditions. However, current electricity pricing structures with large fixed costs compared to variable costs reflecting grid stress have made customers largely indifferent to how they consume electricity.

In contrast, many customers are responsive to gas prices at the pump. Gas prices per gallon are prominently displayed at stations, and the total cost as tanks fill up is tallied in real time. Customers can see how gas prices change over time and whether a gas station farther away is less expensive. They may also choose lower-cost, membership-based gas stations, such as Costco, or fuel up before entering large metropolitan areas where prices are higher. Figure 3 shows an example of the variation in gas prices in a metro area.

Figure 3. Gas station locations and prices as displayed by Google Maps

Source: Google Maps (accessed August 25, 2022)

As the transport sector electrifies, this customer behavior could translate to price-responsive demand in EV fast charging. Dashboard apps could optimize routes and charging stops depending on customer preferences on cost or emissions savings as well as total travel time.

At present, EV fast charging rates are flat to encourage uptake and do not consider grid needs. At currently low penetrations, this has not yet created grid problems, but habits are hard to change once set. Instead of diluting smart charging incentives through rates to attract customers, EV uptake can be encouraged through other means, such as tax credits and rebates.

Siting Decisions Being Made Now Could Better Consider Grid Needs

Siting charging stations where customers can take advantage of lower power prices requires accounting for transmission constraints and regions where generation tends to exceed demand. If there is sufficient aggregated or co-located load as suggested in the following use cases, these charging stations could tap more directly into the transmission system and avoid distribution system impacts.

Use cases could include superhub EV stations offering charging pegged to locational marginal prices along major highways, at park-and-rides outside of metropolitan centers, and at depots where fleets of buses and trucks idle for significant periods. EV charging for delivery fleets could be co-located with their warehouses, transportation hubs and ports, and manufacturing facilities. Renewable plants could also co-locate chargers to sell or perhaps even give away excess energy when prices dip below zero. Where EVs are parked, charging could be programmed to occur when the prices are forecasted to be lowest over the dwell time period.

Siting considerations for new fast-charging stations and fleet depots currently do not include grid needs. Understandably, certain other factors will be primary, such as convenience, land use opportunities and constraints, existing depot locations, equity, and emergency evacuation routes. Planning without addressing grid needs will likely add to required grid upgrades and diminish the ability for EVs to serve as resources that could boost grid flexibility and resilience where needed. To optimally enable EVs to provide grid services and reduce the costs of integrating new supply and electrified demand, the planning of charging sites will need to consider transmission and distribution constraints and access to low-cost, emissions-free generation.

For more on this topic, please see this paper written as part of the ESIG task force on aligning retail rates with grid needs.

Jennifer Chen
Senior Manager, Clean Energy
World Resources Institute

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Grid Forming: A Solution to (Some of) Our Grid Stability Challenges
  • Engaging with Large Loads
  • Energy Systems Integration Group (ESIG) Announces 2025 Excellence Awards
  • Facilitating International Collaboration to Maximize the Value of Renewable Energy Forecasting
  • Germany’s Paragraph 14a EnWG: A Model for the World to Unleash Flexibility and Ensure Distribution Network Security?

Quicklinks

  • Member’s Area
  • Join ESIG

Contact

704-473-0135

PO Box 2787
Reston, Virginia
20195 USA

info@esig.energy

Follow Us!

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on YouTube
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

Special Thanks To Our Sustaining Members

© 2025 ESIG. All Rights Reserved
Custom Site by VIEO Design