Behrooz Bahrani
As the global energy landscape rapidly shifts towards renewable energy sources, ensuring the stability and reliability of power systems has become more complex and critical than ever before. One of the key components in this evolving grid architecture is the grid-forming inverter-based resource. These grid-forming inverters (GFMIs), unlike traditional grid-following inverters, are designed to “form” the grid, meaning they establish voltage and frequency in a power system. However, their integration comes with challenges, particularly around transient stability—a topic that is increasingly becoming a focal point for researchers and engineers.
Understanding Transient Stability in GFMI
Transient stability refers to the ability of a power system to maintain synchronism when subjected to a severe disturbance, such as a short circuit or a sudden loss of generation. For both synchronous generators and GFMIs, transient stability can be analyzed using the power-angle curve, a fundamental tool that relates the electrical power output to the phase angle difference between the generator (or inverter) and the grid.
In synchronous generators, the power-angle curve is derived from the relationship between the generator’s internal voltage (electromotive force (EMF)) and the terminal voltage. This relationship is affected by the mechanical inertia of the rotating mass in the generator, which provides a natural damping effect that helps stabilize the system during and after disturbances.
For GFMIs, the power-angle curve can also be utilized to assess stability, despite the absence of mechanical inertia. The “angle” in this context represents the phase difference between the inverter’s output voltage and the grid voltage, a parameter controlled by the inverter’s internal algorithms. The inverter adjusts its output to maintain synchronism with the grid, and the stability of this interaction can be analyzed using the same principles as those applied to synchronous generators.
The equal area criterion (EAC) is a graphical method used to determine transient stability based on the power-angle curve. If the area representing accelerating power (before a fault) equals the area representing decelerating power (after the fault), the system is considered stable. This criterion applies to both synchronous generators and GFMIs, although the latter relies on its control system rather than physical inertia to manage these areas.
By applying the EAC to GFMIs, engineers can analyze how these inverters will respond to disturbances and ensure that they can maintain grid stability. This involves ensuring that the inverter’s control algorithms are designed to balance the power flow dynamically, just as the mechanical system of a synchronous generator would.
The Role of Current Limiting in GFMI
One of the significant challenges for GFMIs is their limited overcurrent capability. Traditional synchronous generators can typically handle multiple times their rated current during a fault, but GFMIs can only handle around 1.2 to 2 times their rated current. This limitation necessitates the implementation of current-limiting strategies to protect the inverter from damage while attempting to maintain grid stability.
Current limiting in GFMIs is often achieved through two primary methods: direct current limiting, where the inverter’s output is directly constrained, and indirect methods such as virtual impedance (VI). The VI method dynamically adjusts the inverter’s impedance in response to current levels, offering a balance between protection and stability. However, this approach requires precise tuning; too aggressive impedance adjustment can lead to system instability.
In scenarios where current limiting is essential, such as during a fault or large disturbance, the GFMI may switch from a voltage source mode to a current source mode. This switch is crucial for protecting the inverter from overcurrent but can result in the inverter losing its grid-forming capabilities. If the transition back to voltage-source mode is not managed properly, it can lead to prolonged instability or even grid collapse.
Enhancing Stability through Advanced Control Strategies
To address the transient stability issues associated with GFMIs, researchers have been exploring advanced control strategies. Prioritizing quadrature current injection when reaching the current limit and adapting the real power reference are examples of approaches designed to enhance the stability margin of GFMIs under fault conditions. These methods dynamically adjust the inverter’s power output and current references, improving the system’s ability to ride through disturbances without compromising the overall stability.
Moreover, hybrid systems that combine grid-forming and grid-following inverters have been analyzed for their potential to enhance stability. These systems leverage the strengths of both types of inverters, with grid-following inverters providing support during fault conditions while grid-forming inverters maintain overall system stability. The interaction between these inverters, especially during transient events, is complex and requires careful system design and parameter tuning to avoid instability.
The Path Forward for GFMI Integration
The path forward for integrating GFMI into renewable-rich power systems is both challenging and promising. As power systems continue to evolve, the development and implementation of robust control strategies will be essential to ensure that GFMIs can not only coexist with traditional generators but also lead the way in future grid architectures.
Future research and development should focus on improving the fault ride-through capabilities of GFMIs, refining current-limiting strategies, and exploring the interactions between different types of inverters within a system. As we move towards a more decentralized and renewable energy–driven grid, the role of GFMIs will become increasingly pivotal, making it essential to address these challenges head-on.
In addition, the continued refinement of control algorithms, particularly in managing the transition between voltage-source and current-source modes, will be critical in ensuring the reliability of GFMIs under all operating conditions. Collaboration between industry and academia will be key in developing the next generation of GFMI technologies that can meet the demands of a modern, resilient grid.
Conclusion
While the integration of grid-forming inverters presents challenges, it also offers an exciting opportunity to redefine how we maintain stability in power systems. By continuing to innovate and collaborate across the industry, we can ensure that our grids remain resilient, reliable, and ready for the future of energy. The advancements in control strategies and the deep understanding of transient stability in GFMIs are paving the way for a sustainable and secure energy future.
Behrooz Bahrani
Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Ok